If you’re going to downvote, please be so kind leave a tip or a piece of advice so that I can avoid repeating in the future whatever mistake you think I am making. Tsuyoku Naritai, after all.
When someone expands an argument from a comment thread into its own post, I expect them to distill the crux of the matter into something that would be interesting to read even if one wasn’t involved in the original argument. (Ideally, I expect such a post to clearly highlight something interesting, in the LW sense, about the issue or about rationality.) This post doesn’t do that for me.
If you’re going to downvote, please be so kind leave a tip or a piece of advice so that I can avoid repeating in the future whatever mistake you think I am making. Tsuyoku Naritai, after all.
When someone expands an argument from a comment thread into its own post, I expect them to distill the crux of the matter into something that would be interesting to read even if one wasn’t involved in the original argument. (Ideally, I expect such a post to clearly highlight something interesting, in the LW sense, about the issue or about rationality.) This post doesn’t do that for me.
I have allways been terrible at anticipating my fellow lesswongers’ reactions to my pots. For good or bad, I always get surprised.
The article goes back to draft, for now.